"The firm is highly efficient, client-conscious, and you just get a great service and great back-up."
Chambers HNW 2016
The ‘extremely talented’ [criminal] practice head Robert Brown, who ‘always sees the bigger picture’, acted for a number of clients on the Leveson Inquiry
Legal 500 2015
Corker Binning is often instructed in high-profile cases that attract lots of media attention.
Chambers UK 2014
Peter Binning is well versed in large-scale cartel matters. Sources highlight his pragmatic, commercially aware approach.
Chambers UK 2015
Peter Binning is highlighted in Chambers HNW 2016, who is recommended as: "He has exceptional judgement, particularly when defending individuals in big cases. He's an expert tactician and is very easy to work with."
Chambers HNW 2016
The team is also hailed for its flexibility. Sources say the lawyers complement each other well – the set-up is quite diverse which makes them terrifically good at what they do.
Chambers UK 2010
Andrew Smith is well-regarded in Chambers, and notes that he "strategises very well and makes one feel very comfortable with his advice."
Chambers UK 2017
Peter Binning is “very enthusiastic and clear-headed”, and an excellent negotiator. He has an incredible success rate representing Russian nationals facing extradition.
Chambers UK 2010
Independent legal advisors (ILAs)
Recent years have witnessed an exponential rise in internal investigations. When a large company, bank or financial institution suspects misconduct, it will increasingly appoint external professionals, including lawyers and forensic accountants, to investigate the misconduct and to advise whether a self-report should be made to bodies including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or Serious Fraud Office (SFO). An essential aspect of this work is to understand, in as much detail as possible, the factual background to the allegations. This involves reviewing the emails, documents and telephone calls that may be relevant to the allegations. It also frequently involves interviewing directors and employees so that their recollections, and their responses to particular documents, can be analysed.
In some internal investigations, interviewees attend such interviews without seeking legal advice beforehand. The interviewees may have concluded that a lawyer is unnecessary, or the possibility of instructing a lawyer may not have occurred to them. In other internal investigations, the company may suggest, in advance of the interview, that the interviewees seek independent legal advice. The name of a preferred lawyer – or a panel of preferred lawyers – may be proposed. Such lawyers are frequently referred to as ILAs or “independent legal advisors”. Their role is to provide legal advice to the interviewee that is independent from the advice provided to the company.
Being asked questions in an interview by experienced investigations lawyers can be a daunting experience. You may be given little information about the scope of the investigation, the allegations being investigated and whether you are suspected of being complicit in those allegations. You may be unaware whether a regulator is also investigating the allegations, whether the record of the interview will be given to the regulator and whether this record could be used as evidence against you in criminal or regulatory proceedings. You may be concerned about the risk of failing accurately to recall historic events, the risk of potentially incriminating yourself and what you should do if you are asked questions about complex documents prepared many years ago.
The dangers of attending internal interviews without any legal advice are manifold, particularly if the allegations are criminal in nature, such as bribery, fraud or false accounting. It is therefore important to have confidence that the lawyer you instruct has genuine expertise in acting for individuals in criminal and regulatory investigations, understands the full ramifications of an internal interview, and will engage constructively with the company’s lawyers whilst remaining scrupulously independent and acting in your best interests.
At Corker Binning our lawyers have many years’ experience in acting for interviewees in internal investigations, particularly investigations relating to complex financial allegations. We have acted for individuals in internal investigations concerning benchmark rates including LIBOR and EURIBOR, the allegations of manipulation of the FX markets, as well as allegations of corruption, fraud, computer misuse, sanctions breaches and money laundering. We have worked opposite numerous City firms who are instructed to conduct the investigations. Most importantly, we understand how important it is that an interviewee gives answers which are not only accurate, but which place the interviewee’s relationship to the allegations within their proper commercial context.
Ultimately, if you have been asked to attend an interview in an internal investigation, instructing an ILA means not only that you will be placed in a more informed position about the conduct and consequences of being interviewed, but is also likely to improve the reliability and quality of the evidence that you give. This benefits not only you but your employer, who will be provided with a better factual platform for understanding the extent of any misconduct and whether to self-report.More
If you would like to speak to one of our partners with experience of acting as an ILA, please call us on 020 7353 6000.
Named as key individuals in the field of Financial Crime: Individuals by Chambers UK 2017:
David Corker – Band 1
Peter Binning – Band 1
Jessica Parker – Up and Coming
Andrew Smith – Band 3
- Corker Binning is ranked in Band 1 of recommended firms for Financial Crime: Individuals by Chambers 2017.
- Corker Binning is ranked as a first tier firm for Fraud by Legal 500 2016 and David Corker and Peter Binning are named as leading individuals for Fraud.
- David Corker and Peter Binning are the most highly regarded individuals in International Who’s Who of Business Crime Defence Lawyers 2016.